Anthropocene Extinctions
May 9, 2022
Tikalon is located in a widely 
forested suburban area of 
Northern New Jersey, and 
woodland animals are often sighted on our 
streets.  These are mostly 
deer, but several years ago a large 
brown bear nearly destroyed our 
high-density polyethylene (HDPE) garbage can at 
curbside as it was looking for 
food.  The increased 
sprawl of 
humanity across the 
Earth has affected 
animal behavior and 
survivability in several ways.
Not only is there a loss of animal 
habitat, but there's also 
habitat fragmentation caused by 
roadways that prevent free animal movement.  These same roadways are responsible for 
air, 
noise, and 
light pollution that lead to diminished animal 
health and increased 
mortality.  A decade ago, a deer crossing a highway collided with my 
wife's car as she was driving one 
morning.  The deer was apparently not 
injured, but 
damage to the car was extensive.
 
A mother deer and her fawns.
This photograph was taken early in the morning on July 16, 2021, when the animals were foraging on the lawn across from my house.
(Photo by the author.  Click for larger image.)
Our present 
geological epoch is the 
Holocene, a name constructed from the 
Greek word ʿολος (holos, "entirely") combined with a 
suffix, -cene, indicating something recent; so, we live in a period that's "entirely recent."  The Holocene is defined as starting 11,700 years before the year 2000, and this was the start of the 
Neolithic Era (New Stone Age) of 
human development, at which time there were 
globally only about five million people.
Things got slightly crowded by the 
first century, when there were more than a hundred million people, increasing to a billion by 
1800.  From that point, humanity has grown more than a thousand fold to our 
present population of more than 7 billion, and such a large number is enough to significantly change their 
environment.
Humanity has wrought so much change on Earth that 
geologists are defining a new 
Anthropocene geological epoch in the 
geologic time scale, with a name derived from the Greek word for human, ἄνθρωπος (anthropos).  Since these are geologists, they are attempting to define an easily located 
stratigraphic marker of human presence, a "
golden spike."  They have appeared to settle on evidence of humans from the 
mid-twentieth century, the start of the 
Great Acceleration, a time of very rapid 
socioeconomic expansion and the 
Atomic Age.  I wrote about the Anthropocene in two previous articles, 
The Anthropocene, January 18, 2016, and 
Anthropocene Minerals, August 16, 2021.
Any geological marker of the Anthropocene should be easily discovered, and modern 
technology has produced many geological 
artifacts.  In a span of less than an 
average human lifetime, humans have consumed more 
energy than in the twelve 
millennia since the start of the Neolithic.  Modern-day 
strata contain abundant 
plastics, 
concrete and 
supermarket chicken bones.  Other Anthropocene markers are 
deforestation, 
animal husbandry, 
carbon dioxide (CO2), 
methane (CH4), 
plant and animal extinction, and a spike in the diversity and distribution of 
mineral-like compounds.[1-3]
Two 
botanists from the 
Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, 
John Kress, Senior Research Botanist and 
Emeritus Curator of Botany, and 
Gary A. Krupnick of the 
Plant Conservation Unit, have recently 
published an 
open access paper in the 
journal, 
Plants, People, Planet that examines human impact on plant 
species biodiversity.[4-5]  They've found that plant species are going 
extinct because people don't need them.[4-5]
While species may tolerate slight shifts in their habitat conditions and 
adapt, or 
migrate to new habitats, those that can't may become extinct.[4]  Humans have found some plant species to be useful and have therefore 
domesticated them, but others have been driven to extinction.[4]  A related concept is 
co-evolution that drives 
unnatural selection in which creatures 
symbiotic with us have greatly prospered; for example, 
cattle, 
rice, and the 
eucalypts.[4]
In their study, the Smithsonian researchers classified about 30% of 
vascular plant species, such as 
lycophytes, 
ferns, 
gymnosperms, and 
angiosperms, as being either 
winners or 
losers in the Anthropocene.[4] They found that losers greatly outnumber winners, and that this trend will continue in the future.[4]  The researchers also mapped the winners and losers, both 
taxonomically and 
phylogenetically, across the major groups of vascular plants.[4]  They classified 86,592 species into seven categories, as follow:[4]
• Winners useful to humans.
• Winners not useful to humans.
• Losers useful to humans.
• Losers not useful to humans.
• Tentative winners.
• Potential losers.
• Currently neutral species.
 
Plant winners and losers in the Anthropocene.  (a) Ginkgo biloba, (b) Prunus serotina, (c) Magnolia ekmanii, (d) Ceratozamia kuesteriana, (e) Halophila stipulacea, (f) Merremia tuberosa, (g) Araucaria muelleri, (h) Sidalcea stipularis, (i) Cirsium canescens, (j) Asclepias oenotheroides, (k) Grusonia pulchella, (l) Cleisostoma porrigens, (m) Cytisus oromediterraneus, (n) Carex bullata, (o) Cyanea comata, and (p) Eryngium sarcophyllum.   (Fig. 1 of ref. 4, licensed under a Creative Commons License (See figure caption in reference for additional details).[4]  Click for larger image.)
The results show many more loser species than winners; and, if present trends continue, future losers will continue to greatly outnumber future winners.[4]  Although winners and losers are distributed through nearly all the 
orders of vascular plants, all but two of the nine major phylogenetic 
lineages favor losers over winners.[4] Some of the smaller 
ancestral orders might be at risk of extinction.[4-5]  There are 6,749 winner plants; and these, such as 
corn, rice, 
wheat, are those helpful to humans.[5]  There is also the 
curious case of plants now extinct in the wild, such as the 
ginkgo tree, but survive in cities.[5] 
Ginkgo biloba is a 
popular ornamental tree also used for food, and as a 
dietary supplement.[5]  There are 164 winners which are not useful to humans, such as the 
invasive kudzu.[5]
Among the 20,290 loser species are the 
Haitian magnolia tree, cut for 
firewood, 
redwoods and 
junipers, and the ancient 
conifer, 
Araucariaceae.[5]  26,002 species are potential losers, 18,664 species are potential winners, and 571 plant species have already become extinct.[5]  The trend is towards less biodiversity, and this will lead to a loss of animal diversity and more vulnerable 
ecosystems.[5]  Plant 
communities will be much more 
homogenized in the future.[5]  The existence of 
seed banks and 
cryogenic tissue storage means that any plant can be saved from extinction, but an effort must be made to do even such small 
mitigation.
 
Ginkgo biloba are large trees of size ranging from 20-50 meters.
Ginkgo biloba is the last living species in the order Ginkgoales, and the genus Ginkgo was found in the Middle Jurassic about 170 million years ago.
Extracts of Ginkgo biloba leaf are sold as a cognitive enhancer, but there is no evidence that it promotes enhanced memory or attention in healthy people.
(Wikimedia Commons image by Piott.)
References:
-   Griffin Chure, Rachel A. Banks, Avi I. Flamholz, Nicholas S. Sarai, Mason Kamb, Ignacio Lopez-Gomez, Yinon M. Bar-On, Ron Milo, and Rob Phillips, "The Anthropocene by the Numbers: A Quantitative Snapshot of Humanity's Influence on the Planet," arXiv, January 24, 2021.
 -   Robert M. Hazen, Edward S. Grew, Marcus J. Origlieri, and Robert T. Downs, "On the mineralogy of the 'Anthropocene Epoch'," American Mineralogist: Journal of Earth and Planetary Materials, vol. 102, no. 3 (March, 2017), pp. 595-611.
 -   Catalog of 208 human-caused minerals bolsters argument to declare 'Anthropocene Epoch', Carnegie Science and the Deep Carbon Observatory Press Release, March 1, 2017.
 -   W. John Kress and Gary A. Krupnick, "Lords of the biosphere: Plant winners and losers in the Anthropocene," Plants, People, Planet, March 10, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10252.
 -   Sofia Quaglia, "Plants humans don't need are heading for extinction, study finds," The Guardian, March 10, 2022.