Tikalon Header

The First Angiosperm

September 18, 2017

Humans have a fascination with firsts; and, rightly so, since they often mark significant accomplishments for mankind. Notable firsts include the first man to run a four-minute-mile (Roger Bannister in 1954), the first ascent of Mount Everest by Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay in 1953, the first man in space (Yuri Gagarin in 1961), and the first man to walk on the Moon (Neil Armstrong in 1969).

Yuri Gagarin

Soviet cosmonaut, Yuri Gagarin, the the first man in space, in a 1963 photo.

Gagarin died in 1968 in the crash of a MiG-15 training jet he was piloting.

It's suspected that the root cause of the crash was faulty weather information provided by an air traffic controller.

RIA Novosti photo via Wikimedia Commons.


Scientists are often motivated to be the first to make a discovery, and they enjoy establishing priority in the publication of scientific results. That's why scientific journals print the submission date for manuscripts along with the publication date. This competition for priority is mostly friendly, since science involves sharing, rather than hoarding, data, so competing research teams will often arrange to publish their results in separate articles, but in the same journal on the same date. One example of this is the discovery of the J/psi meson, discovered independently by the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and Brookhaven National Laboratory, and jointly announced in 1974.

There's a saying in the Bible (Matthew 20:16) about the last being the first, and this is true for organisms known as the last common ancestor. The last common ancestor is actually the first individual from which all organisms in a particular group are directly descended. The ultimate first in this case is the last universal common ancestor, the last common ancestor of all life now on the Earth. This progenitor of all life we now see could have existed as early as 3.8 billion years ago.

Figure caption

Darwin speculated about our last universal common ancestor having originated in a "warm little pond."[1]

Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) depicted a tree of life ascending to man, the pinnacle of evolution, at least by anthropocentric standards.

On the left, Haeckel's 1879 Tree of Life, via Wikimedia Commons.

(Click for larger image.)


One interesting species adaptation is the emergence of the flowering plants, the angiosperms. Flowers have a multiple purpose. They contain the reproductive parts of the plants, and the flowers are designed to attract pollinators, such as birds and insects. Once fertilization occurs, the flower is host to seed-bearing fruit. The flowers are designed to prevent cross-breeding that could cause crossing back with related species and a lessened diversity. As a consequence, angiosperms evolved to fill a wide range of ecological niches, so there are nearly 300,000 known angiosperm species in about 13,000 genera and 416 families. Charles Darwin himself was amazed at the rapid rate at which flowering plants diversified.

A huge international research team,[2] calling itself the eFLOWER project, data mined scientific papers and created a huge database of modern flower structures, including their sexual organs and the layout of their petals.[3-8] Through an analysis of their more than 13,000 database entries that went back as far as a 1783 description by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, combined with DNA and fossil information, the research team was able to deduce the most likely structure and shape for the earliest flowers.[4]

The angiosperms (flowering plants) comprise about 90% of all plants on Earth, and it's believed that they evolved about 140 million years ago from seed plants that existed 310–350 million years ago.[3] The fossil record for angiosperms goes back just 130 million years, so the first 10 million years of angiosperm evolution is unknown.[3-4,6-7] Modern analytical methods allow the inference of such evolution without a fossil record via the distribution of floral traits among extant angiosperms combined with models of morphological evolution.[3]

To that end the research team assembled their database of 13,444 referenced data points that sampled 792 species from 63 orders (98%) and 372 families (86%) of angiosperms.[3,6] The team inferred twenty-seven floral traits through computer-assisted maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood estimation, and a reversible-jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian analysis.[3] The multiple models of morphological evolution derived from such an analysis were calibratedd with 136 fossil constraints.[3,6] The result was the first model-based reconstruction of ancestral flowers at the earliest stage of angiosperm evolution.[3

angiosperm evolutionary tree

Angiosperm evolutionary tree, radiating from the last common ancestor.

University of Vienna image copyright Hervé Sauquet/Jürg Schönenberger.


Essentially, the research team looked at the structural transitions at each branching point on the angiosperm evolutionary tree and dug down to what the flower of the last common ancestor might have looked like.[6] What they found was that the last common ancestor was bisexual and radially symmetric with whorls of three petals each.[3,6] This discovery overturns the previous idea that early flowers had a spiral arrangement that later evolved to the whorled configuration that's prevalent today.[5-6] This ancestral flower has no match among today's flowers.[4,8]

The appearance of the angiosperm last common ancestor suggests that plants evolved by natural selection to a less complicated floral plan.[7] It must be remarked that the structure of this earliest angiosperm is still just speculative, but the method by which it was obtained makes it a very good guess.[6] A more complete fossil record would dispel any doubts.[5]

The purported last common ancestor of the angiosperms

The purported last common ancestor of the angiosperms.

Fig. 1 (simplified) of Ref. 3, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License[3]


References:

  1. Letter of Charles Darwin to J. D. Hooker, February 1, 1871.
  2. The host institutions are the Université Paris-Sud (Orsay, France), the University of Vienna (Vienna, Austria), Ciudad Universitaria (México City, México), the University of California (Davis, California), the University of Zurich (Zurich, Switzerland), the University of London (Surrey, UK), the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (Santiago, Chile), the University of Munich (Munich, Germany), the Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France), the Universidade de São Paulo (São Paulo, Brazil), the University of Sydney (Sydney, Australia), the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (Edinburgh, UK), ETH Zurich (Zurich, Switzerland), the Universidade de Lisboa (Lisboa, Portugal), Harvard University (Cambridge, Massachusetts), the University of Gothenburg (Göteborg, Sweden), and The University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong, China).
  3. H. Sauquet, M. von Balthazar, S. Magallón, J.A. Doyle, P.K. Endress, E.J. Bailes, E. Barroso de Morais, K. Bull-Hereñu, L. Carrive, M. Chartier, G. Chomicki, M. Coiro, R. Cornette, J.H.L. El Ottra, C. Epicoco, C.S.P. Foster, A. Haevermans, T. Haevermans, R. Hernández, F. Jabbour, S.A. Little, S. Löfstrand, J.A. Luna, J. Massoni, S. Nadot, S. Pamperl, C. Prieu, E. Reyes, P. dos Santos, K.M. Schoonderwoerd, S. Sontag, A. Soulebeau, Y. Städler, G.F. Tschan, A. Wing-Sze Leung, J. Schönenberger, "The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification," Nature Communications, Article no. 16047 (In press, August 1, 2017), doi:10.1038/ncomms16047. This is an open access article with a PDF file here.
  4. Patrick Monahan, "The world's first flower may have looked like this," Science, August 1, 2017, DOI: 10.1126/science.aan7188.
  5. What flowers looked like 100 million years ago, University of Vienna Press Release, August 1, 2017.
  6. Nicola Davis, "Mother of all blooms: is this what the last common ancestor of flowers looked like?" The Guardian (UK), August 1, 2017.
  7. Ashley Yeager, "A new portrait of the world's first flower is unveiled," Science News, August 1, 2017.
  8. Sarah Gabbott, "Did the first flower look like this?" BBC, August 1, 2017.