The Voltage Standard
February 25, 2016
Having done much 
electronic circuit design and 
construction in my 
career,  I have several 
multimeters in my home 
workshop.  The multimeters can be configured as 
voltmeters, I have a few 
analog voltmeters on my shelves, and my 
oscilloscope will also function as a crude analog voltmeter.  When wired to a 
voltage source, these will read nearly the same value of 
voltage, but not the same value.  Fortunately, my work doesn't require too 
precise values of voltage, so I'm not that concerned.
One of my 
digital multimeters will read voltage values to four-and-a-half digits; which, in 
electrical engineering parlance, means that it will read from 0 to 1.9999 volts.  Seeing such a nice array of digits makes you think that your knowledge of voltage is very good.  This reminds me of a 
psychology experiment done many 
decades ago on how people think that 
pocket calculators are 
infallible.
A team of 
psychologists modified calculators to give the wrong answers.  As I remember, nearly all the 
test subjects believed that the calculator answers were right, even though a moment's reflection or a 
back-of-the-envelope calculation would have indicated that something was amiss.  When your 
laboratory voltmeter shows many digits, how many of these can you believe?
Although 
manufacturers take care to ensure that their 
computer chips give the right answers, errors will occur.  One famous error was the 
Intel Pentium P5 floating point division bug.  This was a subtle error, since it would occur in just one in nine billion 
divisions.  Even then, the error was at the few tens of 
parts-per-million level.  Intel recalled all the faulty chips at a cost of nearly half a billion 
dollars.  I recall that in the interim there was a 
software patch for the 
Excel spreadsheet that corrected this error.
Accurate laboratory measurements require 
calibration of 
instruments to 
standards.  Most large 
corporations have a policy of calibrating their laboratory instruments at intervals.  In my laboratory, calibration was done for our 
balances and 
digital thermometers, but rarely for voltmeters.  I had an 
antique instrument, a Leeds & Northrup Millivolt Potentiometer,  that I used to compare voltage readings against a 
standard cell.  A standard cell is nothing more than a specially constructed 
battery, and a 
potentiometer has the unique property of not drawing any 
current from the standard cell when it's compared against another voltage source.
The 
Weston cell, invented in 1893 by the 
chemist, 
Edward Weston, was the voltage standard in common use through 
1990.  The cell 
cathode is an 
amalgam of 
cadmium and 
mercury, the cell 
anode is pure mercury, and the 
electrolyte is an 
aqueous solution of 
cadmium sulfate.  At the anode, cadmium goes into solution as cadmium sulfate.  At the cathode, 
mercuric sulfate becomes liquid mercury.  The 
cell potential is 1.018638 volts.  More information than you'll ever need about the Weston cell can be found in ref. 1.[1]
   | Fig. 1 of US Patent No. 494,827, "Voltaic Cell," by Edward Weston, April 4, 1893.
  This cell served as a voltage standard as late as 1990, but it had the disadvantage that it contained the toxic elements, mercury and cadmium.
  The voltage of a carefully maintained Weston cell is 1.018638 volts, and the temperature coefficient of the voltage is very small.
  (Via Google Patents.)[2] | 
Semiconductor devices started to replace such 
electrochemical voltage reference cells in the 
1960s.  The first practical semiconductor voltage reference was the  
Zener diode, based on a particular 
reverse voltage breakdown effect in highly 
doped semiconductor 
diodes discovered by 
Clarence Zener.  While 
silicon diodes, both Zener and ordinary, have a voltage temperature coefficient of about 2 mV/
°C, you can connect a 
reverse-biased Zener diode and a 
forward-biased ordinary diode in 
series to effectively cancel the temperature effect (see figure).  I've done this trick many times in my own circuits.
Other semiconductor voltage references are based on the 
bandgap of silicon, which is about 1.22 
electronvolts at 
absolute zero.  The first of these, the 
Brokaw bandgap reference, was 
invented by 
Paul Brokaw in 1974.  The Brokaw bandgap reference has a temperature coefficient of just a few tens of ppm/°C.[3]  A more recent 
bandgap voltage reference is shown in the figure.
While these simple semiconductor voltage standards are good for most laboratory work, the world demands much more from its 
primary standards.  That's why a device that operates at 
liquid helium temperatures,  the 
Josephson junction array, is used as today's voltage reference.  Such arrays will give a voltage value that's accurate at the 
parts per billion level.
The principal behind this device is the 
Josephson effect, a property of 
superconducting materials separated by a thin 
insulating gap discovered by 
Brian Josephson.  This is a 
quantum mechanical effect in which 
electrons can 
tunnel through the insulator to allow a current flow.  If a superconductor-insulator-superconductor junction is driven at a 
frequency, 
f, then regions of constant voltage will appear in the device 
current-voltage curve.  These voltages, 
Vn are given as
where 
h is 
Planck's constant, and 
e is the 
elementary charge.  Since the voltages depend only on 
fundamental constants, this is a very nice standard.  One such voltage standard chip is shown in the photograph.  To produce a volt-level signal, the device has many junctions in series, and it's driven at 
microwave frequency.
References:
-   Walter J. Hamer, "Thermodynamics of Standard Cells of the Saturated Cadmium Sulfate Type," Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards A - Physics and Chemistry, vol. 76A, no.3 (May- June, 1972).
 -   E. Weston, "Voltaic Cell," US Patent No. 494,827, April 4, 1893.
 -   P. Brokaw, "A simple three-terminal IC bandgap reference," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 9, no. 6 (December 1974), pp. 388–393.
 -   Robert C. Dobkin, "Temperature compensated bandgap voltage reference circuit," US Patent No. 4,447,784, May 8, 1984.