Insecticidal Sweeteners
August 11, 2016
While not a
fanatic, I'm always leery about
food whose
ingredient labels read like the
index of a
chemistry textbook. I've learned to read ingredient labels more carefully, now, since I've found that I'm somewhat
allergic to
psyllium. This is something I discovered earlier this year while eating a
high-fiber bread. The bread was so
tasty, that I was eating about four slices per day; and, after a few days, my
skin began to
itch. A little
Internet sleuthing led to my easy
diagnosis.
Artificial sweeteners are ubiquitous in foods and
drinks. In the
United States, they're
certified to be
harmless by the
Food and Drug Administration, a respected
government agency. That's why I'm not afraid to use
sucralose (the "
yellow packets") in my
coffee, still adding a little
sugar. I tried
Truvia (the "green packets"), but that sweetener changes the taste of the coffee.
These yellow and green packets join the "pink packets" containing
saccharin (C
7H
5NO
3S, 2H-1λ
6,2-benzothiazol-1,1,3-trione) along with ingredients to reduce its
bitter aftertaste. There are also the "
blue packets" containing
Aspartame (C
14H
18N
2O
5, N-(L-α-Aspartyl)-L-phenylalanine, 1-methyl ester) along with aftertaste-reducing ingredients. People with a condition known as
phenylketonuria need to avoid aspartame.
Truvia is the
trade name for the sweetener containing
rebaudioside A, an
extract of the
Stevia rebaudiana plant, along with the simple
sugar alcohol,
erythritol (C
4H
10O
4, (2R,3S)-butane-1,2,3,4-tetraol).[1] Erythritol, an approved food additive in the US and many other countries, occurs naturally in some
fruits.
Since the ingredients of Truvia have been shown to be
safe for human consumption, it was a surprise when it was found to be
toxic to
fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster).[2] Fruit flies fed Truvia died in six days, and further study showed that the
culprit wasn't stevia; rather, it was the erythritol.[2] I wrote about this finding in a
previous article (One Man's Food..., June 13, 2014). Another sugar alcohol,
mannose, is toxic to
honey bees, but not fruit flies.[2]
This same
Drexel University research team that made this discovery has just published results of fruit fly
experiments using
polyols similar to erythritol, all of which have been approved for human consumption.[3-4] They fed these to adult Drosophila melanogaster along with
controls that included sucrose and non-sweetened food to determine the affect on their longevity.[3] All of the polyols, except for
D-mannitol, had no affect. The D-mannitol, however, was slightly toxic, but only to the
female of the
species (see graph).[3] Female fruit flies were five times more likely to die than males after D-mannitol consumption.[4]
In the experiments, groups of fruit flies were fed with particular sweeteners mixed with their food, and there were two control groups which were fed food mixed with the naturally occurring sugar, sucrose, and unmodified feed.[4] As previously found, erythritol was especially effective in killing fruit flies, all of which were dead by the sixth day; however, two other polyols,
malitol and
xylitol, appeared to have no effect.[4]
When fruit flies were fed with D-mannitol, a sweetener used in
chewing gum, and as a
coating to
hard candy or
dried fruit to prevent sticking, there was no apparent effect for the first week. After the seventh day, these fruit flies displayed a higher death rate than the controls, and the effect had
statistical significance at the twelfth day. The 50% survival point was reached at day 17.[4]
There is no known reason why the female fruit flies should be more susceptible than
males to the toxicity of D-mannitol. Says
Sean O'Donnell, a
professor and
associate department head of
Biodiversity, Earth & Environmental Science at Drexel,
"Implications for insect control could exist, because females are the real reproducers and affecting females can reduce population growth... Furthermore, many social insect pests — such as Hymenoptera, which includes ants and wasps — have female-based colonies."[4]
O'Donnell further clarifies that there is nothing in these experiments that should dissuade human use of these sweeteners. "All the
compounds we tested are
vetted and human-safe... The effects on
insects don't really inform
human health issues in this case."[4]
References:
- Steven J. Catani, "Erythritol-containing tabletop sweeteners and methods of producing same," US Patent Application No. 12/147,075, Publication No. 20090004355, Priority Date, June 29, 2007. Also published as CA2691547A1, EP2173191A1, and WO2009006200A1.
- Kaitlin M. Baudier, Simon D. Kaschock-Marenda, Nirali Patel, Katherine L. Diangelus, Sean O'Donnell and Daniel R. Marenda, "Erythritol, a Non-Nutritive Sugar Alcohol Sweetener and the Main Component of Truvia®, Is a Palatable Ingested Insecticide," PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 6 (June 4, 2014), Document No. e98949, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098949. This is an open access article, available as a PDF file, here.
- Sean O'Donnell, Kaitlin Baudier, and Daniel R. Marenda, "Non-Nutritive Polyol Sweeteners Differ in Insecticidal Activity When Ingested by Adult Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae)," Journal of Insect Science, vol. 16, no. 1 (June 7, 2016), Article no, 47, doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iew031. This is an open access article with a PDF file here.
- Frank Otto, "Ladykiller: Artificial Sweetener Proves Deadly for Female Flies," Drexel University Press Release, June 27, 2016.