∂j/∂T = σT4,where the value of the proportionality constant σ, the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, is 5.670 x 10-8 joule·meter-2·second-1·kelvin-4. The constant is very small, so radiation loss doesn't matter below a few hundred degrees Celsius. The loss, of course, depends on the exposed surface area of the object, as the dimensions of the constant show. Predicting heat transfer seems all too easy. We have the equations, so we just plug in our numbers, right? As one of my physics professors said, everything is just F = ma; the problem, however, is deciding what F, m and a are for your particular problem. The Mpemba effect is the name given to a supposed phenomenon, noted from antiquity, involving the freezing of water into ice. I wrote about the Mpemba effect in an earlier article (October 19, 2006, Mpemba Effect). Writes Aristotle in his Meteorology (Book I, Part 12),
"The fact that the water has previously been warmed contributes to its freezing quickly: for so it cools sooner. Hence many people, when they want to cool hot water quickly, begin by putting it in the sun. So the inhabitants of Pontus when they encamp on the ice to fish (they cut a hole in the ice and then fish) pour warm water round their reeds that it may freeze the quicker, for they use the ice like lead to fix the reeds."[1]The example given by Aristotle of pouring hot water over reeds in freezing weather indicates to me that this might be an effect caused by evaporative cooling, assisted by the flow of cooling air over the reeds by convection. thermodynamically in the last two centuries, the idea that heating water helped in its freezing persisted to the time of Francis Bacon (1561-1626). As Bacon wrote in his Novum Organum (Book 2, Chapter 50),
"Nor should we omit the means of preparing bodies to receive cold. Among others I may mention that water slightly warm is more easily frozen than quite cold."[2]In the 1960s, a Tanzanian high school student, Erasto B. Mpemba, noticed the effect while making ice cream from hot mixes. Mpemba published the results of experiments with his teacher, Denis G. Osborne, in 1969, causing renewed interest in the "Mpemba effect."[3] There has been much published about whether the effect is real; and, if it is real, why.[4] Controversy still persists, since there isn't a formal definition of the Mpemba effect. The end-point might be when 0°C is reached; or, when first ice appears. One reason why the Mpemba effect might be true is a difference in the heat transfer of the initial states. Ice is insulating, and a container of warm water will melt through any frost layer between it and the freezer surface on which it's placed. This ensures an intimate contact with an important heat sink. Good experiments should levitate the water cell with wires to prevent this. This sounds like a good experiment for the International Space Station, an idea suggested by others.[5] A recent study finds that supercooling is an important factor.[6] Thermodynamic processes, such as the evaporation of water mentioned above, are reversible. While it takes a certain quantity of heat to evaporate a quantity of water, that heat is liberated when the vapor condenses. The enthalpy of condensation of water has the same large absolute magnitude as the enthalpy of vaporization, 40.68 kilojoule per mole (2,260 kj/kg), but with a negative sign to denote that heat is being released. University of Washington scientists have found that condensation of water on the exterior of beverage cans is responsible for a large portion of their warming.[7-8] This research vindicates the use of beer koozies/coosies (the cool variant of the tea cosy), which prevents condensation of humidity on the surface of beverage containers, and this effort started with the desire by Dale R. Durran, a professor of atmospheric sciences, to devise an interesting example for his students of the importance of the heat generation by condensation.[8] As usual in science, a back-of-the-envelope calculation was employed, and that showed a measurable effect.[8] Durran calculated that the heat released by a layer of condensate just four thousandths of an inch thickness on a can would heat its contents by 9 degrees Fahrenheit.[8] My own calculation based on the dimensions of a standard 12 ounce US beverage can (6.6 cm, or 2.6 inches, in diameter and 12.1 cm, or 4.75 inches in height) modeled as a cylinder filled with water using an enthalpy of condensation of 2,260 j/g, gives 3.88°C, or 7 degrees Fahrenheit. Alcohol has a lower heat capacity than water, so alcoholic beverages will tend to warm faster. Durran was able to interest one of his colleagues, Dargan M. W. Frierson, in a collaboration to do an experimental validation of this result. In true Ernest Rutherford "string and sealing wax" style,[9] they conducted experiments in a bathroom, using a hot shower to adjust humidity.[8] With validation, some better experiments were in order. Said Durran,
"You can't write an article for Physics Today where the data has come from a setup on the top of the toilet tank in one of the author's bathrooms."[8]These experiments were conducted using an antique apparatus formerly used to simulate cloud formation, along with some funding from the National Science Foundation.[8] This work resulted in an article in the April issue of Physics Today[7] which gives the following information:[8]
• On a typical summer's day in New Orleans, the heat released by condensation will warm a drink by 6° Fahrenheit in five minutes.
• In Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, on the hottest and most humid day, condensation will warm a can's contents from near-freezing to 48° Fahrenheit in just five minutes.