Fifty Years of Chaos
September 9, 2013
If you think that the last fifty years have been more chaotic than others, you're right. This year is the fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of
chaos as a scientifically accessible phenomenon.[12] As befitting the subject matter, this discovery was accidental.
First, a note on the name. Much of the terminology in the physical sciences comes from the Greek lexicon, primarily because our science descends from the Greek philosophical tradition. We have, for example, the word, atom, the combination of two Greek words meaning not able to be cut. There are also the many particles (electron, proton,
meson, etc.) with an on ending. These names are derived from Greek nouns ending in this neuter singular ending; for example, kerion (κηριον), honeycomb.
In Greek mythology, Chaos (Χαος) was the primordial deity from whom all other gods were born. Our modern sensibility thinks that the void is the most pristine state of the universe, but the ancient Greeks thought that even the void needed a progenitor, and that was Chaos. Chaos was the progenitor of two aspects of the void. There was Erebus (Ερεβος), "darkness," and Nyx
(Νυξ), "night." The Roman poet, Ovid, characterized Chaos as "a raw and undigested mass..." ("rudis indigestaque moles...").
Chaos, in its scientific sense, was discovered by the
American mathematician and meteorologist, Edward Norton Lorenz (19172008). In another example that "chance favors the prepared mind," Lorenz made his discovery in the normal course of his research at MIT in computer simulations of Earth's atmosphere. This was at the very early days of computing, so his computer, a Librascope LGP30 vacuum tube computer, had a clock rate of 120 kHz and a 4096 word drum memory of 31bit words.
As any scientist would do, Lorenz was careful to document the system state for his simulations at various times so they could be reproduced. He wrote the variables to three decimal places, but when he tried to reproduce his simulations, the new data didn't match the old. Lorenz initially suspected a bad vacuum tube (his computer had more than a hundred), but his investigations showed that there was no sudden error; instead, the data slowly diverged from the initial state, and they were quite different two months into his virtual weather forecasts (see figure).

Reconstruction of Edward Lorenz' discovery plot of chaos. (Adapted from image in ref. 2.[2]) 
Lorenz studied this phenomenon, eventually publishing his results.[4] In his publication, he presented a simple set of
differential equations that demonstrated this effect, now called the Lorenz attractor. An artistic animation of the Lorenz attractor can be seen on YouTube.[5] The computationallyminded among my readers can reproduce the attractor with the following differential equations, using σ = 10, ρ = 28, and β = (8/3), iterating with a time t increment of 0.01. The YouTube simulation used the Euler method of numerical integration.[5]
dx/dt = σ (y  x)
dy/dt = x (ρ  z)  y
dz/dt = xy  β z
Lorenz called his phenomenon the "
butterfly effect," alluding to the idea that the flap of a butterfly's wings could change future weather. The abstract of his first paper on the matter seemed to warn that any sort of longterm weather prediction was, in principle, impossible.[4]
"For those systems with bounded solutions, it is found that nonperiodic solutions are ordinarily unstable with respect to small modifications, so that slightly differing initial states can evolve into considerably different states... The feasibility of verylongrange weather prediction is examined in the light of these results."
Just as atoms were discussed quite some time before their being accepted as fact, so was the idea that some dynamical systems are extremely sensitive to their initial condition. Mathematician, Henri Poincaré, thought about this in the 1880s when he was investigating the famous threebody problem of whether three bodies under gravitational attraction to each other could maintain stable orbits.[6]
Poincaré, however, didn't have a computer, and he preferred equations over numbers. That's why we're celebrating fifty years of chaos, and not 114 years.
References:
 Adilson E. Motter and David K. Campbell, "Chaos at fifty," Physics Today, vol. 66, no. 5 (May, 2013), pp. 2733.
 Adilson E. Motter and David K. Campbell, "Chaos at fifty," arXiv Preprint Server, June 24, 2013.
 Hugh G. EvelynWhite, Trans., "Hesiod, The Homeric Hymns and Homerica," William Heinemann/The Macmillan Co., London/New York, 1914, p. 86.
 Edward N. Lorenz, "Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow," Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 20, no. 2 (March 1963), pp. 130141.
 Stefan Ganev, "Lorenz Attractor Simulation," April 6, 2011.
 H. Poincaré, "Les Méthodes Nouvelles de la Mécanique Céleste," vols. 13, Gauthier
Villars (Paris, 1899).