Georg Ohm and Ohm's Law
March 15, 2013
Tomorrow,
March 16, is the anniversary of the birth of Georg Simon Ohm, discoverer of what's now called Ohm's law. Ohm, who was born on March 16, 1789, was a German high school teacher when he performed the experiments demonstrating that the electrical voltage E across a conductor increases in proportion to the applied current I. The proportionality constant is the resistance R, now measured in ohms; viz,
E = I R
Ohm may have inherited his facility for experiment from his father, who was a locksmith. Ohm's family valued education, and his younger brother, Martin, became a mathematician. Ohm studied mathematics on his own while he worked as a private tutor in Neuchâtel. His private study paid off. Quitting Switzerland, Ohm entered the University of Erlangen, and he received a Ph.D. in mathematics on October 25, 1811, just a few months after his arrival.
Ohm served as a
lecturer in mathematics at the university for a time at very little pay. Short on cash, he repurposed himself as a high school mathematics teacher in Bavaria, and he taught briefly at two public schools. Ohm knew this was not the life for which he had hoped, so he spent time writing a geometry textbook, the manuscript of which he sent to King Frederick Wilhelm III of Prussia.
The king was suitably impressed, and this landed Ohm a better teaching position at the Jesuit Gymnasium of Cologne (another high school) in the Fall of 1817. At this school, Ohm taught physics as well as mathematics, and the school had an excellent physics laboratory for the time. It was here that Ohm did his electrical experiments, which were summarized in the 1827 paper, "The Galvanic Circuit Investigated Mathematically," (Die galvanishe Kette, mathematisch bearbeitet).
Publication of what's now called "Ohm's Law" probably assisted Ohm in gaining a position at the Polytechnic School of Nuremberg in 1833, and his becoming a professor of experimental physics at the University of Munich in 1852.
The resistor is one of the three (perhaps four) fundamental electrical components, the others being the capacitor and inductor. The figure below shows the electrical symbol for a resistor, and how to calculate the equivalent resistance when resistors are connected in series and parallel.

Ohm's law illustrated using conventional electronic component symbols (left), and the equivalent resistance of series (middle) and parallel (right) combinations of resistors. (Illustration by the author using Inkscape.) 
The series and parallel resistance formulas are easy to understand when you relate them to the fundamental physics of resistance. The resistance
R of a uniform
rod or bar of a material with resistivity ρ, crosssectional area A and length L, as shown in the figure, is just
R = ρ (L/A)
 Resistance formula for a conductor with resistivity, ρ.
(Illustration by the author using Inkscape.) 
You can see that when you put resistors in series, you add the virtual lengths of their internal conductors, so the series formula is obvious. In the parallel case, you're adding the crosssectional areas, so the math is a little different. You're adding the
conductance, which is the reciprocal of the resistance.
All this is textbook stuff, which is exciting to just a few students. There are combinations of resistors which are much more interesting, such as the infinite lattice of resistors shown in the figure. Whenever the idea of infinity enters a problem, it becomes more interesting and often more complex.
A very nice analysis of this infinite array of resistors was published fifteen years ago,[1] and there have been quite a few papers on this lattice array, similar lattice arrays, and cubic arrays.[18]
The following table shows the calculated resistance values, in units of the identical resistance values in the array, between the origin (0,0) and some nearby lattice nodes.[1] The origin, of course, can be anywhere, since this is an infinite array.
(i,j)  R  
(i,j)  R 
0,0  0  
2,2  (8/3π) 
0,1  1/2  
3,3  (46/15π) 
1,0  1/2  
4,4  (352/105π) 
1,1  2/π  
5,5  (1126/315π) 
The interesting thing here is that some nodes will give
rational numbers, and other nodes will give values containing π, an irrational, transcendental number.
References:
 D. Atkinson and F. J. van Steenwijk, "Infinite resistive lattices," Amer. Jour. Phys., vol. 67, no. 6 (June, 1999), pp. 486492. A PDF copy can be found, here.
 J. H. Asad, "Infinite Body Centered Cubic Network of Identical Resistors," Arxiv Preprint Server, February 19, 2013.
 Jihad H. Asad, "Exact Evaluation of The Resistance in an Infinite FaceCentered Cubic Network," Arxiv Preprint Server, October 7, 2012.
 J. H. Asad, "Infinite Face Centered Cubic Network of Identical Resistors," Arxiv Preprint Server, May 5, 2012.
 Jozsef Cserti, Gabor Szechenyi and Gyula David, "Uniform tiling with electrical resistors," Arxiv Preprint Server, March 7, 2011.
 J. H. Asad, R. S. Hijjawi, A. J. Sakaji and J. M. Khalifeh, "Resistance Calculation for an infinite Simple Cubic Lattice Application of Green's Function,"Arxiv Preprint Server, May 1,2009.
 J. H. Asad, A. J. Sakaji, R. S. Hijjawi and J. M. Khalifeh, "On the resistance of an Infinite Square Network of Identical Resistors Theoretical and Experimental Comparison," Arxiv Preprint Server, April 3, 2009.
 R. S. Hijjawi, J. H. Asad, A. J. Sakaji, M. AlSabayleh and J. M. Khalifeh, "Infinite Simple 3D Cubic Lattice of Identical Resistors (Two Missing Bonds)," Arxiv Preprint Server, March 24, 2009.