They travel in pairs. The structure of DNA, showing the G-C/A-T pairing. (Chemical structure diagram by Madeleine Price Ball (modified), via Wikimedia Commons). |
A Martin Electric Guitar. Martin is experimenting with DNA tagging.[4] (Photo by Alex Harden, via Wikimedia Commons. |
2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 16Might it be possible to create DNA with at least one additional base pair to allow ternary codes? The first step in this direction was taken in 2008 by Floyd Romesberg and his colleagues at the Scripps Research Institute (La Jolla, California). After first trying 200 modifications of the natural base pairs with no success, they turned to combinatorial chemistry to generate 3600 pseudorandom candidates. Two of these, called dSICS and dMMO2, worked with a little molecular tweaking that encouraged pair bonding.[5-6] The two novel bases are quite unlike the natural bases. Romesberg is quoted in New Scientist as saying,
3 x 3 x 3 x 3 = 81
"We got it and said, 'Wow!' It would have been very difficult to have designed that pair rationally... We now have an unnatural base pair that's efficiently replicated and doesn't need an unnatural polymerase... It's staring to behave like a real base pair."[5]In 2009, Romesberg's group demonstrated transcription of their bases into RNA in vitro, and further studies have shown that the pair bonding of their artificial bases is quite different from the hydrogen bonding of the natural bases. Instead, the bases are held together by hydrophobic forces; that is, they cling to each other within the water molecules surrounding the DNA. Romberg speculates that the natural hydrogen bonding process could have been a random choice of several available to evolution.[7-8] Not even the polymer backbone is sacrosanct. Another international team was able to store and recover genetic information from six xeno-nucleic acids (XNAs) not found in nature.[9-10] The four natural bases were part of these XNAs. It appears that many polymers can perform the same replication trick done by DNA.[9-10]