"Because conventional, propeller-style wind turbines must be spaced far apart to avoid interfering with one another aerodynamically, much of the wind energy that enters a wind farm is never tapped. In effect, modern wind farms are the equivalent of sloppy eaters. To compensate, they're built taller and larger to access better winds."[5]Instead of focusing on making individual turbines more efficient, the Caltech approach, which is described in the Journal of Renewable & Sustainable Energy, is to make the farm itself more efficient.[5-9] It also tries to lower capital and maintenance cost by making the turbines smaller and closer to the ground.[5] Winds at higher altitude have much higher speeds than those close to the ground, but all variables are subject to trade-offs when you take a systems approach to the problems of extracting cost-efficient wind energy. The Caltech Field Laboratory for Optimized Wind Energy (FLOWE) and its array of vertical-axis wind turbines. Note human in lower right hand corner for scale. (Screen capture from a YouTube video) [9]. Only six vertical turbines were used in the study reported in the Journal of Renewable & Sustainable Energy, but Caltech's Field Laboratory for Optimized Wind Energy (FLOWE), shown above, now has twenty-four ten-meter tall, 1.2-meter-wide vertical-axis wind turbines. This facility is located on two acres in northern Los Angeles County. One trick to increased efficiency was to have turbines rotate in opposite directions to their neighbors, which apparently allows a constructive interference that reduces drag.[6] One test in which the turbines were placed four turbine diameters apart (5 meters, or about 16 feet) completely eliminated the aerodynamic interference between turbines. This is possible for horizontal turbines only at a twenty diameter spacing. This produced a power density of 21-47 watts per square meter, far in excess of the horizontal turbine efficiency of 2-3 watts per square meter, or an order of magnitude difference.[6] Small vertical wind turbines mitigate other problems of the large horizontal turbines. There's less noise, fewer bird and bat strikes, and the facilities are more aesthetic. Kind of a Drag is a song by The Buckinghams that attained number one ranking on the Billboard Hot 100 for two weeks in February, 1967. This coincided with my brief career as a top 40 disk jockey for a small AM radio station.
Yes, an authentic photograph, except for the psychedelic coloring. The photograph dates to 1967 when I was about twenty years old. I would never have survived in the Clear Channel era. |