• Green Braking, October 20, 2010The following table summarizes the sources of environmental energy, and how much of this energy we can harvest.[1] It's not surprising that solar energy tops the list. Solar energy has powered all the biological processes on Earth for more than three billion years.
• Pyroelectric Energy Harvesting, October 15, 2010
• Flutter Power, August 17, 2010
• Hot Bodies, July 22, 2010
Energy Source | Power Density(μW/cm2) |
Solar (Direct Sunlight) | 15,000 |
Solar (Cloudy Day) | 150 |
Solar (Indoors) | 6 |
Vibration | 100-200 |
Acoustic Noise (75 dB) | 0.003 |
Diurnal Temperature Cycle | 10 |
Temperature Gradient (10°C) | 15 |
Reference (One year Lithium Battery) | 89 |
• Body Heat 2.4 - 4.8 WOne human energy harvesting application that's been around for as long as I can remember is the "self-winding" mechanical watch. This technology was tweaked with the advent of digital watches to comprise a voltage generator powered by the same wrist movements. An alternative energy harvesting design was the Seiko Thermic wristwatch, which used ten thermoelectric modules to generate a microwatt or so from the small thermal gradient between body and ambient temperature.[3] Some proof-of-concept systems have been done for shoes,[3] and the less obvious case of mechanical stress on the fabric in the clothes that we wear.[4-6] In the later case, researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, prepared nanofibers of the piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) that could be woven into garments. The fibers, which had diameters as small as 500 nanometers, were found to generate up to 30 millivolts and 3 nanoamps under mechanical strain at a conversion efficiency of about twelve percent.[4-5] These data correspond to a maximum power of
• Blood Pressure 370 mW
• Exhalation 400 mW
• Breathing (Total) 830 mW
• Chest Band (Breathing) 0.42 W
• Arm Motion 0.33 W
• Finger Motion 0.76 - 2.1 mW
• Footfalls 5.0 - 8.3 W
P = EI = (3 x 10-2)(3 x 10-9) = 9 x 10-11 watt,or about 100 picowatts. If we can sum the power of a thousand of these fibers, we could obtain a power of 100 nanowatts, or 0.1 microwatt. Actually, the most likely architecture would be many longer fibers that would accomplish the same task with fewer interconnects. This is still a very small amount of power, so more work needs to be done. In contrast, the shoe generator gives us about five watts. Recently, researchers from the Biomimetics Laboratory and Department of Engineering Science of the The University of Auckland (New Zealand) and Industrial Research Limited, also of Auckland, have published a different approach to human energy harvesting in Applied Physics Letters.[7-8] They use dielectric elastomers, stretchable materials that are called "artificial muscles." The Auckland elastomer devices had a generating capacity of about 10 mJ/g, and they were able to convert mechanical work to electricity with a 12% efficiency. These energy harvesters are inexpensive, and their combination of softness, flexibility and low mass make them ideal for many environmental energy harvesting applications. They can be inserted into clothing to provide energy from human movement, and it appears they can generate more power than the piezoelectric nanofibers.
Schematic of the physical layout of the soft generator. (Image: American Institute of Physics) |