An oblique, southwards-looking view of Gale crater. The Curiosity Rover landing site is north of the mound inside the crater. (NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU/UA Image). |
• Mastcam - Mast Camera.Mars Science Laboratory (Curiosity Rover). (NASA/JPL-Caltech Image). The Curiosity rover contains so much instrumentation that simple solar power would not have been enough. The rover uses a radioisotope thermoelectric generator, as I described in a previous article (Radioactive Heat, July 26, 2011), for its electrical power and heat. The rover's size, typically described as being as large as a sport utility vehicle, and 900 kg weight, required a different sort of landing mechanism than the "bouncing ball" approach of the Spirit and Opportunity Rovers.[3] The landing will be accomplished by a rocket-powered sky crane that will suspend the rover on tethers in its descent to the Martian surface.[4] It was impossible to reach a consensus from scientists as to where to land this Martian probe. The decision process started in 2006 when more than 100 scientists in several worldwide workshops considered about 30 potential landing sites.[4] In 2008, a shortened list had crater sites in the top three positions, but astrobiologists favored sites lower on the list with ancient lakebeds and deltas. These seemed to them more likely to hold organic residues of life than the deep crustal topography of the craters.[7] The final decision, from a short list of four candidates, was made by mission principals in a "smoke-filled room."[7] The decision was not popular in some circles. Some scientists are concerned that Gale Crater is, in fact, too unique. It's a geologic mystery.[7] Carlton Allen, curator of astromaterials at NASA's Johnson Space Center (Houston, Texas), thinks Gale's unique features should be a cause for concern, not curiosity. Allen is quoted in Science as saying, "This is a one-shot, billion-dollar mission, and you're talking about going to a place [that] we have severe questions about how it formed."[7] The Curiosity Rover mission was originally scheduled for launch two years ago, but there were technical problems which caused a long delay until the next match of the orbits of Earth and Mars. The original mission cost of $1.6 billion now stands at $2.5 billion.[6] NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, California), manages the Mars Science Laboratory Project.[4]
• ChemCam - Chemistry and Camera.
• RAD - Radiation Assessment Detector.
• CheMin - Chemistry and Mineralogy.
• SAM - Sample Analysis at Mars.
• DAN - Dynamic Albedo of Neutrons.
• MARDI - Mars Descent Imager.
• MAHLI - Mars Hand Lens Imager.
• APXS - Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer.
• REMS - Rover Environmental Monitoring Station.