One memory I have from my youth is the family laundry flapping in the wind on the clothesline. Upstate New York, where I spent my childhood, is a very windy area, and quite a few wind farms are being sited there, much to the consternation of the local residents.[1] These wind farms use the current wind-harvesting technology; namely, huge turbine-generators mounted on tall towers. Engineers at Cornell University have been developing a new type of wind energy-harvesting that has much in common with clothing flapping on a clothesline.
Wind farm in Kansas (Photo by Elekhh)
Air is a fluid, and wind is a flowing fluid, so there's a commonality between methods of harvesting energy from flowing water and the wind. Turbines, of course, are used in each case, but there's another method. A decade ago, researchers invented the energy-harvesting eel, a flexible tube that oscillates in flowing water. Piezoelectric transducers of Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) change this mechanical motion into electrical current.[2-3] The Cornell University approach uses PVDF, also, but their wind harvester resembles tree leaves.[4-6] Although this harvester is not that efficient, its appearance is less objectionable than that of a wind turbine, so it's more suitable for urban areas.
One simple such device, much like the energy-harvesting eel mentioned above, has a flexible airfoil attached to a piezoelectric pole. Air flow causes the pole to vibrate, generating electricity. Note that piezoelectrics generate their electrical currents through multiple bending and release actions, such as vibration. Bending a piezoelectric will generate an electrical pulse, but holding it steady in that bent state generates no further energy. There must be continual movement to obtain energy. Wind tunnel tests showed that a 13 centimeter long device in a two meter-per-second airflow will generate a few milliwatts. Running many of these in parallel (a "tree") lets you sum these milliwatts into watts of power. Another approach, as shown in the figure,[6] uses a flapping motion as found in actual tree leaves. The power output for this approach is less, but the piezoelectric leaves are smaller and easier to make. The following figure shows two configurations of the energy-harvesting architecture, and the table shows the measured performance of microwatts of power for particular airflow conditions.
Horizontal and vertical arrangements of the piezoelectric wind energy-harvester [6]
Orientation | Configuration | μW | m/sec |
Horizontal | Long single-layer PVDF stalk | 17 | 6.5 |
Vertical | Short single-layer PVDF stalk | 296 | 8.0 |
Vertical | Long single-layer PVDF stalk | 76 | 3.5 |
Vertical | Long air-spaced double-layer PVDF stalk | 119 | 6.5 |
Another Cornell team is designing structures that focus the airflow onto the active portions of the devices, generating a little more power per leaf. They estimate that such wind-harvesting systems could attain about five watts per square meter of cross-section. Since a hair dryer requires about a thousand watts of power, you would need an area about the side of a barn to dry your hair.[7] Not only that, the wind must be blowing, so it would be better to just stand outside for a while and let the wind dry your hair.